JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Ana Betty Cardenas Herrera Vs. Cisa Central De Inversiones S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Catorce Civil Del Circuito, El Juzgado Once Civil Municipal Y El Juzgado Veinticuatro Civil Del Circuito, Todos De Bogota Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Once Civil Municipal De Bogota
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Central De Inversiones S.A. Cisa
  • Naturaleza
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Reglas para el trámite
  • Inaplicación
Accion De Tutela Contra Cisa
  • Competencia de Juzgado Civil Municipal
  • Sociedad comercial de economía mixta indirecta del orden nacional
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Discrepancia sobre la naturaleza jurídica de la entidad demandada
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Remitir al Juzgado 11 Civil Municipal de Bogota, el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por la senora Ana Betty Cardenas Herrera contra Cisa Central de Inversiones S.A, para que la tramite y decida sin mas dilacion.
  2. Segundo. Informese al otro despacho judicial trabado en el conflicto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Dissenting opinion
Read dissent
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Presidente
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.